There are 15 people round the meeting table, and on the agenda a list of desired facilities for the personnel1. The attendees are asked to add any facilities2 they feel would be beneficial to the company3.
The lone woman4 expresses a desire to see a new addition5: sanitary protection available in the women’s washroom6.
It is put forward that this is already covered by “improved sanitary facilities7”, particularly as only 20% of the personnel are women8. The woman4 begs to differ. ‘Sanitary facilities’ does not mean sanitary protection9, and it is not because the minority is a minority that it should not be taken into account.
But improvements to the facilities will include whatever is necessary10, retort other attendees. Sanitary protection is surely considered necessary11. This is not a given according to the woman4: since none will be installed in the men’s washroom too, it may be overlooked12.
But we can’t provide sanitary protection for everyone13, argue other attendees: every woman is different and surely has their own preferences in feminine hygiene products14. But providing sanitary protection does not mean providing a range of products9, insists the woman4. It is availability of any sort of product that counts15.
It is proposed that another point5 be added: “specific sanitary facilities in the women’s washroom16”. 14 people vote for the motion. The lone woman4 abstains.
Continue reading →