That didn’t take John McWhorter long:  An Empty Seat Next to Me?  I Wish!

Obviously, in the interest of fairness, John McWhorter needs to make sure you know this doesn’t happen to him.  Or his friends.  Because of course the problem is that we don’t hear enough accounts of how racism doesn’t really affect black people.  (Or how they should pull themselves up by their bootstraps.)

It’s a skillful bit of spin.  And if you read the comments around the web, you’ll see it’s a viewpoint that is widely praised.  When the cup is half full, you should be grateful for that half cup.  Because you were never entitled to the full cup at all.

I am mystified by John Edgar Wideman’s account in The New York Times about how people on the Amtrak Acela train don’t take the seat next to him until it’s practically the only seat left. I am mystified not because I haven’t heard plenty of claims of this kind. I am mystified because nothing of the sort happens to me.

Note: I am not questioning Wideman’s experience — which is what makes accounts like this such a challenge for me to wrap my head around. In my book Winning the Race, I devote a chapter to this type of thing — of the sort that motivated Ellis Cose’s classic Rage of a Privileged Class. It was the hardest chapter I have ever written.

Quite simply: Over the past nine years, I have ridden the Acela up and down the corridor from Boston to Washington, D.C., quite often. Like Wideman, I also prefer the quiet car, and thus our experiences are that much more equivalent. On top of this, I am always on the lookout for the kind of “subtly racist” experience that even middle-class black people, especially men, of unthreatening appearance are supposed to have, as what one of Cose’s interviewees termed a “daily litany” of slights.

But Wideman’s Acela experience is simply not mine. On the contrary, because, like Wideman, I kind of enjoy having that empty seat to put my bag and food containers on, there have been many times when someone has sat next to me when the train was nowhere near full and I have grumbled to myself, “Why next to me out of all these other empty seats?”

This is the truth. It is based on several dozen Acela trips. It is based on my own experience in my own black skin. And there is nothing I do to invite company on the train; I almost always have my nose buried in a book or newspaper.

Important: I most certainly did have Wideman’s experience in the past. In the ’70s and well into the ’80s when I was a teenager, I would often take the PATCO train between Philadelphia and New Jersey. I quickly noticed — and without being primed by other people talking about it, and not yet keyed into literature on the subject — that whites wouldn’t sit next to me unless the seat next to me was the last one, or close to it. And I most certainly did not look “threatening” — I was Urkel squared.

So I do know my racism when I see it. But I have thought of the change in my train-travel experience as evidence that America is moving on. I first noticed the change in the early ’90s in California when I would often take trains and buses to and from San Francisco. So it sincerely challenges me to read an account like Wideman’s. Why him and not me? Note — I accept the “him” part. But the “me” part must also be accepted. I am telling the truth, and my glasses are not so rose-colored that that I cannot perceive discrimination unless somebody is burning a cross in front of my house.

Upon which I should add: I have never been stopped for Driving While Black, even when driving beat-up cars in exclusive white neighborhoods. If anyone has “trailed” me in a store, it was because he or she was a salesperson trained to try to get customers to buy things; in New York, these people are usually black or Latino, for the record, and I always see them “trailing” someone else before or after they deal with me.

And when I step off the curb and raise my arm for a taxi in New York, one stops. In eight years of New York life, I have been waiting to be bypassed by a taxi — I almost yearn for it because it is presented as a kind of rite of passage for black men in New York. It has never happened, anywhere in town — ever.

Now, if this were only about me, I’m not sure I would write about it. But because this subject intrigues me, I have asked other black men about it. I know a good eight — some friends, some acquaintances — who say that their experience is like mine. And they are a diverse set in terms of skin tone, demeanor and size. Like me, they hear how even middle-class black men living in a mainstream American context “endure” “constant humiliation” and “dismissal” — and cannot see these descriptions as reflecting a life that they live. Racism once in a great while? Sure. Racism as life itself? Sorry, but no.

Most certainly, someone can much more plausibly make that claim if he lives in a rough neighborhood constantly trawled by the police. But we’re talking about something more specific: people like me and Wideman — i.e., the While Black phenomenon. And the problem is, some people make claims like Wideman’s, and some do not.

I am speaking up here for the some who do not. Pieces like Wideman’s are often taken, understandably, as evidence that his experience is representative — and that therefore, racism colors the day-to-day experience of all black people, just as it did in the Jim Crow South — just more “subtly.”

But if we are going to have an honest discussion about whether that’s true, in 2010 we must also hear from black people for whom this life sounds alien, largely something we hear and read about rather than experience. In that discussion, just as I will not dismiss someone like Wideman as fantasizing, it will not do to dismiss my friends and me — who I am quite sure “represent” legions of other black men of similar circumstance — as fantasizing, or as too dim to perceive bias unless it’s cartoonishly overt.

Nobody sitting next to me on the train until it’s full? I only wish!


6 thoughts on “Well.

  1. wow. I thought Wideman poured months into his research. It seems it only takes 5 minutes of this other guys time to spit out some “truth.”

    It seems one of our authors is more serious about acquiring information than the other. I can write something up in 5 minutes disputing something. That doesn’t make it right.

  2. I don’t doubt that he’s telling the truth, just as I have some gay friends who stare at me blankly when I describe the horrific homophobia I’ve personally faced. The problem is that his experiences (whether they’re the majority or not is irrelevant*) gel with what the dominant class wants to believe, and so they’ll use his experiences as a way to dismiss the experiences of PoC who *do* face continuing and constant acts of racism. Pretending that black people (and other PoC) are “oversensitive” or “imagining racism” is already a well-used strategy to sweep racism under the rug, and they’ll use experiences like Wideman’s to bolster that strategy.

    * Even if what he experiences is what the majority of blacks experience and we say (for the sake of argument) that it’s a minority of blacks who experience frequent acts of racism, it doesn’t really matter, because it’s still unacceptable and wrong whether it’s 80% of PoC facing it, or 40%, or 5%. It still has to be fought and overcome even if it’s the reality for only a small number of PoC, because even a small number is too many. Nobody should have to face oppression. (As for me personally, I don’t believe it *is* a small number or the minority that face frequent subtle racism, but I wanted to kill any potential argument by expanding on the issue now.)

  3. one thing about McWhorter is that he always has been a black republican who tries to tell black people that most of the setbacks and difficulties they face are not due racism but the crazy ideas they have in their heads.

    He’s like John Ridley who they bring out on HuffPost to tell white folks they are right in decrying the real delusional racists who are black people.

  4. Well, I believe this guy’s story, but would it have killed him to keep it to himself? Now everyone who read that other piece, and thought, “Damn! I’ll have to be more sensitive to this kind of racism” is probably now thinking “oh, OK, nevermind.”

  5. “When the cup is half full, you should be grateful for that half cup. Because you were never entitled to the full cup at all.”

    This should have been the title of the post. Or else it should have been in bold. By the time I got through reading McWhorter’s apology, I was almost thinking, “well, yeeees, he’s right”, but then I snapped out of it and read the beginning bit again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s